Case Notes

A core function of BPEQ is to investigate and action breaches of the Code of Practice for RPEQs and offences against the PE Act.

BPEQ is committed to assisting RPEQs maintain high standards of professional practice. To provide practical examples and guidance BPEQ publishes case notes regarding disciplinary proceedings against RPEQs and prosecutions for offence against the PE Act.

Disciplinary proceedings can be brought by BPEQ against RPEQs who breach the Code of Practice for RPEQs. Prosecutions are brought by BPEQ against unregistered persons for offences against the PE Act.

Disciplinary Proceedings

Board v A

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as ‘A’) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v B

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (deidentified as B) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v C

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as C) in the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v D

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as D).

Read Now
Board v U

This was a disciplinary action brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as U) which settled at compulsory conference before the Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v F

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as F) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v H

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as H) in the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v L

This case was a disciplinary action by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as L) in the Queensland Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v M

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified to M) in the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v N

This was an internal disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as N).

Read Now
Board v O

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as O) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v P

This was a disciplinary action brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as P).

Read Now
Board v R

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as R) in the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v T

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as T) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v W

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as W) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v X

This was a prosecution by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as X) in the Magistrates Court of Queensland.

Read Now
Board v Z

This was a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Board against a RPEQ (de-identified as Z) in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Read Now
Board v E2

The engineer (E) had more than 15 years’ experience as a civil engineer; E had previously been registered with the Board as a RPEQ but had allowed their registration to lapse.

Read Now

Prosecutions

BPEQ v E

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning use of the RPEQ title.

Read Now
BPEQ v H

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning the carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person.

Read Now
BPEQ v N

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning false claims of being a RPEQ, use of the title RPEQ carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person.

Read Now
BPEQ v N1

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning the carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person.

Read Now
BPEQ v S

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning the carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person.

Read Now
BPEQ v Q

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning the carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person and use of the title RPEQ.

Read Now
BPEQ v V

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning use of the RPEQ title.

Read Now
BPEQ v X

This case was a prosecution in the Magistrates Court of Queensland concerning the carrying out of a professional engineering service by an unregistered person.

Read Now