MY ACCOUNT
18 Jun Board of Professional Engineers of Queensland v N
This case was a prosecution brought by the Board of Professional Engineers of Queensland (“Board”) against N (deidentified) in the Magistrates Court of Queensland (“Court”).
Charges
The charges against N alleged that N presented himself as a registered professional engineer despite not being registered as a registered professional engineer at the time, that N used the title of “registered professional engineer of Queensland”(“RPEQ”) despite not being an RPEQ, and that N carried out professional engineering services despite not being registered.
In addition, there was a further charge of failing to supply a document as requested by the investigator appointed to consider the charges.
N’s Background
N was not registered as an RPEQ at any time while undertaking the work in respect of which the complaint was made.At the time of the conduct, N held a diploma in civil engineering, and was continuing studies to obtain a bachelor of civil engineering.
Conduct of N
N was engaged by a Body Corporate to inspect a retaining wall in need of repair or replacing at a property in Brisbane. N attended the property in to perform a site inspection.
N subsequently prepared an inspection report which contained the findings of his inspection of the retaining wall, and included drawings for a proposed replacement retaining wall. N also issued a Form 15 Certificate for the construction of the retaining wall in accordance with the drawings N had prepared. N was not a registered professional engineer at any time when providing these engineering services in relation to the retaining wall.
Following a complaint being made to the Board in relation to N’s conduct, an investigator was appointed to consider the complaint. N received a notice in September 2007 requiring that a particular document be supplied to the investigator; however N failed to supply the document.
What the Court Said
In this instance, the matter did not proceed to a hearing before the Court, but was settled by a formal agreement between the parties which was considered and adopted by the Court. N agreed N was guilty of the charges of presenting N as a registered professional engineer, using the title of RPEQ and carrying out professional engineering services despite not being registered as a professional engineer at the time, and of failing to supply a document as requested by the appointed investigator. The parties agreed that a conviction should not be recorded given this was N’s first offence.
Consequences for N
The parties recommended to the Court that the appropriate penalty was for N to pay a monetary penalty and the Board’s costs. The Court subsequently made an order confirming the recommendations made to the Court by the parties, ordering that N was guilty of the charges and was convicted, although no conviction was recorded.